Showing posts with label sprituality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sprituality. Show all posts

Sunday, August 26, 2007

The Spiritual War Against the Native People Of "America"- Is True Reconciliation Possible?



by Phil Duran
Duran's BIO:

As background, I will begin by saying that in 1998 I moved to South Dakota with my wife to become the director of First Nations Institute, a post-secondary school for Native Christian believers, and I was there only 18 months because of the decision to close campus operations. I am a scientist and educator, not a missionary or a “minister” in the normal sense of that word. However, I am self-trained in Bible knowledge, having extensively studied systematic theology, eventually reviewing article manuscripts, served as part-time pastor and denominational representative, and for more than three decades served as deacon in two churches. I am very familiar with life in Indian country and the pressing issues that the tribes have been dealing with for hundreds of years. I do not depend on church funds or church approval for the full-time work that I do with the tribal communities, because I am paid by a Tribal college where I directed a program in environmental studies. My specific area is theoretical physics.

Read the article HERE.

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Crusades - Christian In Name, But Not In Truth



Crusades – A Definition
The Crusades were a series of military missions, usually organized and promoted by the Pope and/or Roman Catholic Church. The crusades took place through the 11th and 13th centuries A.D. The original intent of the crusades was to recapture “Christian” lands that had been invaded by Muslims.

SOURCE

The Crusaders used the Christian cross as their symbol. They believed that the symbol of the cross made them invincible against the armies of the Muslims. The word "Crusade" came from the Latin word for “cloth cross.” Eventually, the word "crusade" was used to describe the entire journey from Europe to the Holy Land.

Crusades - Why were the Crusades launched?
The Crusade were responses to Muslim invasions on what was once land occupied primarily by Christians. From approximately 200 A.D. to approximately 900 A.D. the land of Israel, Jordan, Egypt, Syria, Turkey, etc. was inhabited primarily by Christians. Between 900 and 1075 A.D., Muslims invaded these lands and brutally oppressed, enslaved, deported, and even murdered the Christians living in those lands. In response, the Roman Catholic Church and "Christian" kings/emperors from Europe ordered the crusades to reclaim the land the Muslims had taken. As the crusades progressed, they became far more focused on establishing kingdoms than on reclaiming lands that had once belonged to Christians.

Crusades - Overview of Main Crusades
First Crusade: The first crusade was launched by Pope Urban II after the Council of Clermont in 1095 A.D. The Eastern Orthodox Patriarch of Constantinople sent a letter to Pope Urban II, asking for his assistance against the progressing Muslim invaders. Urban gave a call to Christians throughout Europe to recapture the Holy Land, and especially Jerusalem, from the Muslims. The crusaders of the First Crusade departed in 1096 and eventually recaptured Jerusalem in 1099. On the way to Jerusalem, the crusaders established “kingdoms” for themselves in various cites in the middle east.

Second Crusade: Shortly after the First Crusade, the Muslims counter-attacked and captured the city of Edessa in 1144 A.D. St. Bernard of Clairvaux traveled throughout Europe, encouraging people to “take up the cross” and push the Muslims back from what they had retaken. Lacking a clear and persuasive goal, and marked by incompetence in leadership, the Second Crusade was an utter failure.

Third Crusade: The Third Crusade was launched in 1189 A.D. In 1187 A.D., the Muslim armies, led by Saladin, had re-conquered Jerusalem. Although at first a huge army was amassed, the Third Crusade was ultimately unsuccessful. The Holy Roman Emperor, Frederick I Barbarossa of Germany, drowned, under uncertain circumstances, on the way to the Holy Land. Richard the Lionheart of England was able to recapture several coastal cities, but did not attempt to retake Jerusalem due to a lack of resources. Lionheart did negotiate a peace treaty with Saladin, allowing for Christian pilgrims to enter Jerusalem without danger.

Fourth Crusade: The Fourth Crusade began in 1202 A.D. Lacking clear direction and strong leadership, the fourth crusade eventually resulted in a battle between Catholic and Orthodox Christians and the conquering of Constantinople by the Christian armies. The conflict destroyed any unity that remained between Catholic and Orthodox Christians.

Fifth Crusade: The Fifth Crusade took place in 1217 A.D., and was led by Andrew II of Hungary and Leopold VI of Austria. The Fifth Crusade was successful in capturing the city of Damietta, but could not hold it for long, especially after a crushing defeat at the Battle of Al-Mansura. Leopold and Andrew were actually offered control of Jerusalem and other Christian sites in the Holy Land in exchange for the return of Damietta to Muslim control. However, in his misplaced arrogance, Cardinal Pelagius refused the offer, turning a victory into an utter defeat.

Sixth Crusade: The Sixth Crusade was launched in 1228 A.D., and was led by Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II. The Sixth Crusade ended with a peace treaty that gave Christians authority over several important Christian sites, including Jerusalem.

Seventh and Eighth Crusades: The Seventh and Eight Crusades were led by King Louis IX of France. Both were complete disasters. In the Seventh Crusade, Louis recaptured Damietta, but later had his army routed. In 1270 A.D., Louis died before he was able to reach the goal of the Eighth Crusade.

The Ninth Crusade: The Ninth Crusade was Led by King Edward I of England in 1271 A.D. It was an attempt to defeat the Mamluk sultan of Baibers. The crusade failed, and Edward returned home to England upon learning of the death of his father, Henry III.


Crusades - Christian in name, but not in truth
The violence and barbarism of the Crusaders gave Christianity a bad name. While it can be debated whether going to war against the Muslim invaders to re-capture Jerusalem and the Holy Land can be justified, in no manner can the deplorable actions of the Crusaders be justified. The Crusades may have been undertaken by those claiming the name of Christ, but they most definitely did not follow Christ's example.

Part of the problem with the Crusades was the identity of many of the Crusaders. The majority of the Crusaders were essentially "the scum of the earth," the "lowest of the low." They were those who had nothing to lose, and supposedly everything to gain. Even during the trips through Europe on the way to the Holy Land, pillaging, burning, rape, plunder, and other deplorable acts were commonplace. The frenzy of the First Crusade even resulted in the slaughter of Jews in the Rhineland. The Crusaders justified the murdering of Jews by claiming it as revenge for the Jews killing Jesus. Thousands of innocent Jews were murdered and tortured.

When the Crusader army was finally asble to conquer Jerusalem, the slaughter was unimaginable. The Crusaders killed everyone inside Jerusalem, whether Muslim, Jew, or even Christian. By that point, the First Crusade was entirely about conquering lands for personal wealth, not for reclaiming the Holy Land for the Church.

Crusades - Unbiblical, unethical, and un-Christ-like
While the crusades were ordered and led by men who claimed to be Christian, in no sense should the crusades be referred to "Christian." It is highly unlikely that many of the participants in the crusades truly knew Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. The true purpose of “Christian” was twisted, corrupted, and humiliated by the evil actions of many of the crusaders.

The crusades were brutal and evil. Many people were forced to "convert" to Christianity. If they refused, they were put to death. This is blatantly unbiblical. . .and perhaps that is the best summary of the issue. The concept of conquering land in the Name of Jesus Christ is completely unbiblical. Jesus Christ nowhere advocates war and violence. The crusades may have been done by so-called Christians. . .but the actions that took place in the crusades were absolutely opposite to all that the Christian faith stands for.

Monday, December 04, 2006

Burning Sensations


I asked my friend David just last night about how I should go about talking to people about the things on my heart and mind after some spirited debates with someone else. Here is an excerpt:

I wonder if you think I am flirting with the condemnation thing- I don't think I am. I don't believe I am driving anyone away from Christ- but trying to get them to deal with some hard questions just like we went through. I believe that good will come from it. I truly feel guided on this and will continue until God places another
directive on my heart.:

Here is his reply:

Scott,
I cannot answer to your motives. You know what is in your heart.

As you are aware, I would not have had my eyes opened, to several very carnal biases that blocked my service to Christ, had you not, engaged me on some of these issues.
Also, if you pick up your Bible and begin reading Jeremiah you will quickly become quite tired of the monotony of Jeremiah's warnings and graphic depictions of punishment to Judah.
Thus, the quote from Jeremiah "And I can’t stop! If I say I’ll never mention the Lord or speak in his name, his word burns in my heart like a fire. It’s like a fire in my bones! I am weary of holding it in!"
It brought no joy to Jeremiah to speak of pain, suffering and loss. It drove away many people who were unwilling to open their eyes. It left Jeremiah drained and alone.

And Plenty of men, far more important and authoritative than I am, advised Jeremiah to 'change his tune' or just 'shut-up,' which was not God's purpose for Jeremiah.
Hence, Jeremiah did what was right in God's eyes but not man's.

With that said however, as I have noted many times in these discussions, Jesus will be glorified in all actions, regardless of whether they are acts of faith by faithful men and women or whether they are acts of faithlessness by faithless men and women.

Pilate brought glory to Jesus by his cowardly hand washing ceremony, but it was to Pilate's shame.

John brought glory to Jesus by his accepting Mary into his home as his own mother, and it was to John's honor.

Here are some guideposts for you to judge your own words & actions in this exchange with [your friend]. (Hopefully these will help.)


*
Is your motive and purpose to glorify Jesus?
*
Is your motive and purpose to serve [your friend]?
*
Is your motive and purpose to cause [your friend] to admit fault?
*
Is your motive and purpose to cause [your friend] to admit Dick Cheney's or G.W. Bush's fault?
*
Is your motive and purpose to cause [your friend] to quietly reflect on whom he places his highest allegiance?
*
Is your motive and purpose to win the debate?

I believe that it will help you to place these in their proper priority, by simply placing a number (1 through 6) next to each one, (1) being your highest priority and (6) being the least or non-priority.
You should probably set an objective standard too, on how you will know for certain that these "goals" have been achieved, e.g. for "Is your motive and purpose to win the debate?" [your friend] will write back to you saying "You are right and I am wrong, please accept my apologies."

I think that you will do well to consider these questions and what the conclusion of your debate will be.

Many, times planting the seed will be the only thing one can do.
The sower may be long gone by the time the seed germinates and brings fruit.
But, if the sower keeps digging up the seed to see if it's germinating, what will be the end result?

I hope that this helps.

For His honor,
DSM

And here is my reply back:

The first and only thing that comes to mind as far as a priority is the sharing of spiritually based wisdom, discernment and the mutual cultivation of theological literacy with my relationships and thus glorify Jesus.

I suppose to desire sharing wisdom implies that one believes himself to be wise. Is this desire the common burning shared by men that God has called out? Or is it pride? Why do we write? Becuase we desire to tell men about our God and to save them from folly I reckon? I certainly have not chosen subjects that will glorify my standing with peers. Is it vain to think of oneself as a fisher of men? An evangelist? A representative of God?

What is truth? Is it worth speaking for?

Certainly men the world over presume to speak for God and some... to kill for him....which is one of the things we must confront about this existence.


I apreciate the scripture on Jeremiah. I am not literate enough on the Old Testament.


I must tell you about a recent experience... a message so to speak...that I had.

I cast my mind before the Lord asking him what he wanted me to do about the things that burdened my heart- and the answer came back as,

"Kill it at the root".


This was a severe and shocking reply. A mindbender, because it is the very last thing I would have guessed I would hear. It came though with such searing power to boot. This was not easy to comprehend at first- especially for someone who had been squelching all the pride, lust, greed, envy and untruth from their mind in order to remove any thing that would trigger the impulse that moves the mind out of the frame of love and into angst and violence. "Kill it at the root". What a thing to say to a pacifist.


As I ransacked my mind trying to figure what in the great googly moogly it meant...It came to me that the key would be in understanding what the "ROOT" actually was. My mind was at light speed. It did not mean killing evil people. It meant destroying evil at the place where it really starts... cutting evil off from the very foundation of its existence.....LIES......

LIES- the great primordial and most ancient, and original sin. The thing that Satan was the father of.

Essentially then, the message was to combat darkness and evil by spreading truth and light. How to determine truth is another question. Gulp.

Heavy man. HEAVYY.

I already know that you understand...and that perhaps this sheds light on a few other things in play in discussion. What a wonderful gift from God to have a friend like you.


Right now my eyes are teared.

A fitting song:

Friday, November 10, 2006

Ship Of Fools


Click on the small arrow in the corner of the screen to play.

Ship Of Fools (Save Me From Tomorrow) Lyrics:

We're setting sail to a place on the map
From which no-one has ever returned
Drawn by the promise of the joker and the fool
By the light of the crosses that burned
Drawn by the promise of the wormen and lace
And the gold and the cotton and pearls
It's the place where they keep all the darkness you need
You sail away from the light of the world on this trip, baby

You will pay tomorrow
You're gonna pay tomorrow
You will pay tomorrow

Oh, save me, save me from tomorrow
I don't want to sail with this Ship of Fools, no, no
Oh, save me, save me from tomorrow
I don't want to sail with this Ship of Fools
I want to run and hide
Right now

Avarice and greed are gonna drive you over the endless sea
They will leave you drifting in the shallows
Drowning in the oceans of history
Traveling the world, you're in search of no good
But I'm sure you'll build your Sodom like you knew you would
Using all the good people for your galley slaves
As your little boat struggles through the warning waves
But you don't, pay

You will pay tomorrow
You're gonna pay tomorrow
You're gonna pay tomorrow

Oh, save me, save me from tomorrow
I don't want to sail with this Ship of Fools, no, no
Oh, save me, save me from tomorrow
I don't want to sail with this Ship of Fools, no, no

Where's it coming from
Oh, Where's it going now
It's just a, it's just a Ship of Fools

Friday, October 06, 2006

Are You Actually Living the Passion of Christ?

"Though the cross of Christ has been beautified by the poet and the artist, the avid seeker after God is likely to find it the same savage implement of destruction it was in the days of old. The way of the cross is still the pain-wracked path to spiritual power and fruitfulness."

"So do not seek to hide from it. Do not accept and easy way. Do not allow yourself to be patted to sleep in a comfortable church, void of power and barren of fruit. Do not paint the cross nor deck it with flowers. Take it for what it is, as it is, and you will find it the rugged way to death and life. Let it slay you utterly."

-A.W. Tozer, from "Coddled or Crucified?"

Saturday, September 30, 2006

Chomsky Video Clip- On Responsibility



click on the small arrow at the corner of the screen to watch or listen while staying with this page.

Monday, April 17, 2006

Cherokee Words On Human Rights



Transliteration
Nigada aniyvwi nigeguda'lvna ale unihloyi unadehna duyukdv gesv'i. Gejinela unadanvtehdi ale unohlisdi ale sagwu gesv junilvwisdanedi anahldinvdlv adanvdo gvhdi.

Translation
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
(Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights)